Climate Dynamics Group
at the University of California, Santa Cruz

Causes and consequences of Arctic amplification elucidated by coordinated multimodel experiments

research paper
  • James A. Screen
  • Alexandre Audette
  • Russell Blackport
  • Clara Deser
  • Mark England
  • Nicole Feldl
  • Melissa Gervais
  • Stephanie Hay
  • Paul J. Kushner
  • Yu-Chiao Liang
  • Rym Msadek
  • Regan Mudhar
  • Michael Sigmond
  • Doug Smith
  • Lantao Sun
  • Hao Yu
updates ↓

12/06/25 Screen, J.A., A. Audette, R. Blackport, C. Deser, M. England, N. Feldl, M. Gervais, S. Hay, P. J. Kushner, Y.-C. Liang, R. Msadek, R. Mudhar, M. Sigmond, D. Smith, L. Sun, and H. Yu (2025), Communications Earth & Environment, doi:10.1038/s43247-025-03052-z.

Human-induced warming is amplified in the Arctic, but its causes and consequences are not precisely known. Here, we review scientific advances facilitated by the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project. Surface heat flux changes and feedbacks triggered by sea-ice loss are critical to explain the magnitude and seasonality of Arctic amplification. Tropospheric responses to Arctic sea-ice loss that are robust across models and separable from internal variability have been revealed, including local warming and moistening, equatorward shifts of the jet stream and storm track in the North Atlantic, and fewer and milder cold extremes over North America. Whilst generally small compared to simulated internal variability, the response to Arctic sea-ice loss comprises a non-negligible contribution to projected climate change. For example, Arctic sea-ice loss is essential to explain projected North Atlantic jet trends and their uncertainty. Model diversity in the simulated responses has provided pathways to observationally constrain the real-world response.